8. That the petitioner is now charged by the Commissioner of Justice with being lax in handling elfairs. As to which instance and in what way. the petitioner was Ruilty of the fact, no evidence was adduced by the said Commissioner to substantiate his charge.
9, That such a proceeding is at once arbitrary and contrary to law, It, therefore, could not be let pass without seriously impairing the authority of the Inw and the Government and losing the confidence malist pri new reign It, more. honour of the petitioner 10, That Article 18:
Criminal Code of the Republi China provides "whoever Information or makes. false, com K._That Article 52 of the Con-Pact snys) "a judicial officer shall not, during his tenure office, be subjected to reduction of, salary, transference to another police, and shall not be removed from office, except when he is convicted fof a crime recording to law or fsabjectel to dineiplinary punishment which necessitates his dismissal.
The. regulations for the discipline sodicial officers shall be pre seribed by law."
That again, Article 2 of the aw governing: the. Discipline of Sudis.al Officers says, "The dis cipline of judicial officers. shall be carried out upon the decision of the Commission for the Discipline of
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.