Judging from the above cone clusions, the appeal ix yurtly Meht and that portion of the original decision acquittinyg the accused of the charge of misappromiation should be set aside in accordance with the second part of the Article 28 of the amended criminal pro= cedure of the former Mixed Court, and a separate judgment be given in accordance with the firat part of the Article 20 and Av of the criminal cole ing portion of th missed as in the principal wordings.
Dated August 20, (chopped) Judges Ho Chen Ven-ka
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.