There is even a question of doubt! whether or not this section of the nationals, among which is one styled MacDonald v. Anderson which has been quoted in One Extraterritorial Cases, Page 77, and decided by His Majesty's Supreme Court of China. In that decision there are many cogent statements made which give reason and logic to. that Court's riling that land and its incidents are subject to the lex situs. Among ame of the reasons set forth by hat Court is one holding that land that owned by French, German and subjects of the other treaty nowers. If the homeland' law of each proprietor is to apply to his land in Tientsin there will be different periods of limitations, prescriptions for servitudes, ete., according to the nationality of the owner for the time being.
It also held that there is a distinction between extraterritorial Nehts as applied to the person and to that applied to immovables, and in its final conclusion decided' that after taking everything ints consideration the lex cod site should govern to do justice to all concera-
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.