Three Confined to Hospitals Chapei Police Intervene ty of five Japanese were in Chapei by a party of 50 to 60 Chinese and were So severely beaten that three of them had to be taken to hospital the Yangtszepoo District for treat-Tt is understood that the is to be taken up diplon Two of the group were Japanese monks. The other three Fwere adherents to the, faith well, In Ying Ziang Kong, ver the Settlement boundaries and short distance beyond the outer most Settlement police box, the monks were going along, their ritual and fingering their beads, 'A group of Chinese surrounded them, and taunting them, caused crowd to collect. The monks xemonstrated with the crowd and in little while national spirit inflamed both parties, The Chinese laid on with clubs" and The tones, melee attracted "the attention of the Chapei police who intervened, dispersing the mob. The police engaged a hire car and sent the more seriously injured to the Sacred Heart Hospital, No. 1. Ningkuo Road, where first aid treatment was administered. gated by the ans and the bureaux And. ministries attached thereto, Articles '9 and 23 of the Organic Act of the Nationalist Government} would seem to give the yuans their subordinate bureaux and ministries this power, According to the Chinese construction, therefore, laves promulgated by the Nationalist} Government, as well as regulations} promulgated by the various yuans these subordinate ministries are which have been duly, enacted and' promulgated, and which zay and should be endorsed by the Chi nese courts in the Settlement, Many of the administrative laws and regulations are valuable-additions to Chinese jurisprudence and donot in any. way impinge upon the prerogatives of the Council. It is dificult, however, to decide w regulations should be applied in the Settlement, and which should not, especially "when the Courts insist that they are not enforcing them judicially, but administratively, This question has never been thoroughly understood and discussed until this year. The difference of opinion between the Council and! the Chinese authorities is due pr cipally to fundamental differences in the conception of law enforcement. No serious question has yet arisen due to the fact that ibe] Council's attitude has been oro 3 explained and is sow understo by the Judges of the couits in Settlement. It is hoped, however, that at the termination of th sent agreement, the ques shat laws are applicable in urfs in the Settlement will clarified,
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.