When the Court resumed on Wednesday, Counsel for the plaintiff reviewed the evidence at length. He sai [that the whole quest was not.
Jcontained references to three months notice and in one letter which the Jchairman of the defendant company had written to the plaintiff, which letter had been written after the plaintiff had refused to sign the third contract, the chairman
Jarrangement could be made. that he thebght some friendly Philip's had been quite prepared to Jmect the company, if financial} troubles were worrying them.
In the third contract, which was Met signed by the plaintiff but which had boon prepared by the company rasa clause! company finding it necessary dismiss the plaintiff, three months' notice would be given. Counsel, therefore, submitted that the company were satisfied that three months' notice was a reasonable After' Quotiig from the, law and litre cages; counsel intimated that
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.