her chapter, but it seems by the last, was completed in the Bubbling Well Road Wheel" ease, last Friday morning, in the Mexican Consular Court, before Judge N. F. Allman, when J. J.
Tudge's verdict, since the fin Alvarez "appeared to hear the adiiresses of counsel had been <0} eluded at the last hearing.
Mr, H. D. Rodger, with whom was associated Mr. J. E. Badeley, acted as prosecutor, "and accused was represented by Dr, 0. Fischer.
'The charge against Alvarez was that he conducted a gambling place at 151c, Bubbling Well Road, better Known as the "Wheel," permitting gambling on his premises, and with having in his possession' gambling paraphernalia contrary tothe: Mexican Code which applies to gambling.
When the heating was resumed: ast Friday morning, Judge Allman aid that he first desired to thank Br, Rodger for undertaking the prosecution of the ease, the duties which were very onerous, and which had been conducted in a very ble manner, as was.the defence by Dr. Fischer. A fine, under oe: jo 69-of the Mexican Criminal Jo, of Pesos, 500,, the. maxinturs fine, and the costs of the action, tion has' been violated.
TIL. Likewise, there is a violation of Article 16 of the said Constitution which prescribes that tio-body can be molested in his person, domicile, papers and possessions except by virtue of a written from the competent that only the judicial authorities may Issue orders for domiciliary searches, and these must be in writing, all of which requirements have not been observed in the present case, IV. The foregoing constitutional doctrine is upheld by Article 117 of the Federal Code Penal of Procedure, and, this therefore, article has been likewise violated.
Undue Vexation A flagrant violation of Article 123" of: the aforesaid Code also exists, inasmuch as not only undue vexations were caused on entering by force and searching the residence of my client the first time, but those vexations were continued by the Municipal Police when they occupied the residence in question during a period of several week: i taken possession of food, tobacco, or having consumed those in the premises without authority from their legitimate owner, VI. Likewise, "an inexcusable' violation of Articles 86, 95 and 137 of the above named Federal Code appears inasmuch as the period of instruction prescribed by the law! was not observed, nor the preliminary. testimony from the accused was taken.
'VET. A greater legal breach exists a yet through the fact that, spite of the opposition of the undersigned counsel, an.oath was
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.