"This, it is plainly clear, means, that any property belonging to another person, may, be the, object appropriation, irrespective of Sehutber the tight be the prepersy is that of ownership, pledge, or other right in rem, or' whether the property came into the possession of the alleged offender by virtue of law, contract, or through the management of the affairs of others, but in Chinese law there is one condition necessary to establish this kind of offence, and this condition, is that the alleged offender must not be, himself, the owner of the property which is the object of the alleged misappropriation, This view
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.