In HM. Supreme Court on Tuces day morning, before Judge G. Wy King, the case was concluded int which Messrs, Joseph King & Coy asked for an injunction to restrain, Mr, Thomas Freeman from selling sausages or pork pies under his own name. Mr. H, D. Rodger appeared for the plaintiff, while Mx. Pres conducted his dwn case," The anag first came up on June 1, when an, order for pleading being grated: was adjourned until yesterday to allow the defendant time to file hia defence.
Court, in February 1928, Messras According to statement made ig) Joseph King & Ca, of which the partners ae Mr. Joseph King and Mr. la. T, Hallworth, bought the manufactory outright from By Krimsky, who bad held that he ws sole owner and proprietor. In 1926 Mr, Freeman bad sold the business to Mr. and Mrs, Tessar and My, By Krimaky, and had received Tis, 1,000 from Tessar for his share in the business. Later Krimsky, who had given Mr. Freeman a promissory note for Tls. 1,000, said that he could not pay the amount and theres fore transferred his. share in the manufactory back to Mr. Freeman's name in lieu of payment. Krimsky. had complained that Tsar kept all the profits and, after Mr, Freeman had sailed for 8. Africa, he brought case against Tessar in the Pr sional Court, in which he obtained Judgment, and was declared sole owner of the manufactory, "This business he then sold Joseph King & Ca. outright, but Mr. Hallworth in. giving evidence said that advertisements appearing local"papers in October, 1927, were the first intimations he bad that he had not full right to use the name of Thomas Freeman, The case continued all the morn= ing and about 12.90 p.m. upon the defendant agreeing and giving undertaking in open court that would not in the future: mamuface ture pork pies or. sausages under his own name, the plai drew his prayer for an Judge King hold that the purchase of the: business by Joseph King Ca. had been made bona fide and was binding.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.