Claims to Intervene in Action against Insurance Ca. Decided Tu the United States Court for Chint on Thursday his Honour judge Lobingtcr grave judgement in action at the instance of E. Y. Kamoroysky against the Hartford Fire Insurance Ca. and the American reign Insurance Association, the ease arising on a petition to inter. vene. Mr. Davies appeared for the petitioner and Mr. Faison for the insurance companies. In giving judgement his Honour said This is an action" to recover a sum alleged to be due plaintiff by virtue of a certain fire insurance policy issued "at his request and cost, and for his use and benefit, out, apparently, in the name of warehouseman with whom ths insured property was stored. The insurance company and its agent, 1, cth of whom are made defendants, answer, admitting the issuance of the policy, averring that they had cen restrained by judicial order fiom paying part of it and express sing their willingness to pay the balance to the insured. The other parties, M. A. Topas & Ca, and E.
Golempolski now seek iniervéne for the purpose of sequestering the same fund basing—their claim on the following provision "Any person who has or claims an interest. in the subject matter of litigafinn, in the success of either of the.paitics or against both, may, before trial, become a party to the action by joining in the plaintiff's claim of the defendant's resistance or by demanding relief adverse to both.'
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.