And now let us deal in truth and not in ghosts of false suggestion adroitly raised by this message.
The pamphlets returned were indeed the property of a man apparently not connected the Bureau and it was for this rea-ison they were given back. (Other leaflets of an anti-Japanese nature, foclonging to the Bureau were, how-lever, seized, we believe).
When the leaflets were returned, a personal undertaking was given to the Chairman of the Council that they would not be distributed in Shanghai. Otherwice, they would not have been returned, What the American Chamber of Commerce circulated to its m+mbers was xe have reason to belove quite different from the pamphlets returned to the Bureau, Does the Publicity Department, which sent us the above message, wish to imply that the American Chamber of Commerce has been disseminate jog antiJapazese propaganda?
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.