Mrs." A. Stalianova Mr. h was sued by Supreme Court on January 13, before Judge King, "connection with a claim for' $155, moneys alleged to have been lent to de~ fendant, in hor claim, plainti alleged that she had. originally lent de-fondant §200 on February 20 and $100 more in June and July last when defendant married. Defend-fant had paid back $100 in two instalments of $60 each and plainti®? had given him receipts for these sums, "When she went to defendant's house on a number of occasions; defendant paid her $20, $10 and then $15, thus leaving Balance of $155. She had applied for this money but defendant, tthe instigation of his wife, had refused to pay. Plaintiff threatened to bring suit and she had told defendant that he would. lose face, Dut defendant had said, "Maskee, do as you please," so she had brought action.
Tt having been proved that a summons had been served and that defendant had failed to appear, Judgment was given in plaintiffs favour for $155.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.