hit was held that, i th Enver in Council, 1925, a yule (So. 218 (3). providing that trator refuses to act ud the other parties decline to ike an appointment to fill the! vacancy, the Court appointrient, was override the statutory provision of the Arbitration Act, 1889, which, such a ease, empowered the who hay not refused to act, And rule 218 (3) was mad under a provision of the Ottoman Order in Council, 1910 (Articte 129), which is to the same effect fas Article 185 of the China Order in Council, 1925.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.