Tht jury retired, and after an absence of just over half an hour, returned the following answers to questions his Lordship had put to Was there a new verbal agreement entered into after the written agreement of October 1, 1920, to pay a further Tls. 20 per month?—No.
Did Mr. Hammond's servant with the authority of the defendant, cut off the light in February?—We are strongly of opinion that Mr. Hammond or else his agent did cut off the light. The deposit of Ts, 600 _be returned.
Did defendant's servant cut the ropes on the eart?—The coolie on Mr. Hammond's authority did interfere, but whether he cut the ropes is doubtful.
he jury assessed damages for
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.