You are not making it up now according to the old formula?—It ig a similar formula but abbreviated.
Mr. Sd.uhl—When did they think it advisable to change the formula? What were the contents?
Witness—Liquid potash, soap, coconut oil and peroxide. 7 Mr, Schuh] put in an advertisement inserted by defendants in al local paper, asking persons possessing bottles of the shampoo, made up according to the old formula, to yveturn them, to the drug company, in. exchange for new bottles.
If the old formula shampoo, witness continued in reply to Mr. Schuhl, were left on a_ persons; head for half an hour it might cause a reddening of the scalp. Before sending out bottles of the liquid it was customary to test the liquid, to ensure that it was accor'ling to formula.
My. Schuhl]—It is not tested on coolies' heads?—No. (Laughter.)
Mr. E. Pozniakoff, employed in "Ca" department, defendant firm, stated that he had received two dozen bottles of the shampoo from the last witness. Witness noticed that one of the bottles was only two-thirds full. Some of the bot-ties were put into a container and neutralized with oleic acid.
At this stage the proceedings were adjourned until next morning.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.