In the course of his judgment, his Honour said it seemed clear that the plaintiff in the case referred to did accuse Mr. Kentwell of fraud, and thg articles complained of, in so far as they referred to the causes of action, seemed to quote from the writ and to use no stronger language than was there used. Indeed tha defendant's editor stated that he prepared the headlines from what purported to be a "literal quotation from the writ." The petition, it was true, alleged that defendant.
Gntended to charge and assert and to be understood as charging and asserting. that this plaintiff had been charged with the crime of fraud,"
But apart from the articles themselves there was no evidence of this, The phrase "charged with fraud'*
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.