A lengthy legal argument qnsued on the motion to strike out. demurrer and set, in the case of Samarcq and R. Fermus v. 'Asia Banking' Corporation.. Mr. L. G. Husar appeared fvr the plaintiff, on behalf of Mr. C. J. Fox, and maintained that inasmuch as the first general demurrer of defendant had been overruled, they were not within their rights in filing a second demurrer.
Mr. A. Chalaire, for the defendants, held that certain: important points could only be raised in demurrer, that the same was not intended to delay the course of the case, but was necessary to obtain information on_which to proceed therewith.
The Judge took the motion under advisement.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.