Aflar the third consecutive all-day hearing, the ease concluded ju' H.M. Supreme Court, on Fri-
Jess $321 which has still to be agreed upon by counsel of the two parties, wes given in favour of Mr. Borlsogebsky by Judge A. G. Mossop. The $321 was counter-claimed asa set lott by the defendants for having to pay for certain plans, which, they alleged, should have been supplied by the plaintitt.
"the first hearing of the case wns early December, when the plaintiff sued for $9,122, since then the claim had diminished to $5,000 or $0,000. 'The final statement of claim of the plaintiff was $6431 under an agree Front, or $4482 on a quantum merunt 'Judge A. G. Mossop observed, following Mr. MeNeill drawing atten' tion to the reduction of the plaints statement of claim, that it showed eminently it was a case which ought to have gone for arbitration, on Mr, Newman's application for costs, his lordship said he would only award costs on a scale applicable to the nett amount due after allowance for. the set-ott.
Counsel for the plaintiff also put ina claim for interest since the start of the action in September last year, but this was not granted.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.