Mr. N. H. Muir, defendants' safety and publicity super: ntendent, said that plaintiff called o: bim on the following day and reported the accident. Witness asked him why he was standing on the platform. He replied thai there was no room inside. His coat was scorched in the back. He looked quite normal. Nothing was said about him being hurt. As plaintiff was out of work and wanted a new coat immediately, witness obtained cne for him, but it was too large and witness then gave him an order to get new one.
Mr. A. ¥. Tait, acting roiling stock superintendent, produced a model of the tramear and traier, After describing the wiring ay vougements of the lighting cir-cult, witness said the voltage was 500 direct current. He agreed with Dr. Cumming that if plaintiff had got any appreciable shock from that current, he would have been seized with severe muscular contractions.
Closing defendants' case. Lipson Ward said the que: to be determined were: plaintiff receive any shock from an electric current, or from fright
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.