To the Editor. of the Nonru-Ciina. Dauy News."
Sim; So much of our charity has"
that greatness which Christ insisted: characterized the 1 possession and practice of thi tue. So much is @ hollow imitation, uninspired and. unimbued by that~ true "love" which He made was its only true synonym: The Very word has something chilly and repulsive-about it; instead of that hospitable glow which is its intends ed aura, I feel your article under Notes and Comments of this day has missed the point. I deprecate the essay of the American Red Cross, into polities. A true appreciation and Fractice of Red Cross principles. surely does not permit the intro" duction of inquiry into the censes of need; but is concerned only. with its existence and cure?
Did the Good Samaritan stay his ud. because the local government had failed to discharge its obligee Hons' in providing adequate. police protection? Only if "Cross" is to he-torn from its juxtaposition with "Red," enn the American Red Cross ting justification for its. decision to refuse (but we still have hope) to meet a need, irrespective of its can Tam, ete, P.S..1 am not the "Wayfarer" of. yesterday's letter in your columns, but this. has been my> pseudonym for several years of corresponding to your esteemed paper. another column an article found tena exactly what haw the rellet'ef the Tuininesstreker 39 people. in other "county Snverat, members of the Japans ese House of Peers arrived: here from north China on October 28, and wore welcomed by a num ber. of Chinese and Japanese offic cials, including Mr, M. Shigemitsy, the local Japanese Consul-General, and Mr. $. KO. Chen, director of the Shanghai office of the Ministry of Froign Aft The. Medium That
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.