It was revealed from Dr, Sellett's "testimony that on April 6, 1695, which wasa Saturday, the amount) due from Wong, the compradore, was about $103,000, and, on the next business day, namely, April 8, the records disclosed that the amount due from the compradore was Infereased by about $20,000.
At the conclusion of Dr, Sellett's} testimony, Dr. Grossmann, counsel for Kleffel, started to question witness, but several of his questions were not allowed to be answered. A request by Dr. Grossmann that the contents of a loiter from Dr, Sellett.|to the Municipal Advocate about the Jcompradore be admitted was over-
Dr. O, Fischer, also counsel for Kleffel, questioned witness whether the had had conversations with the Jcompradore and Dr. Sellett replied hat he had numerous conversations with the compradore in the past six weeks or two months, most of the conversations bank, Dr, Sellett disclosed that the com: pradore had once admitted In wit-
Mess' presence that he arranged [borrow money, temporarily, and put Hthe money in' native banks, so he Jgot from these native banks certifeates showing his amount in these tive banks was equal to the amount lue from the compradore to. the -O.B.C,, showing that the A.-O.BC, money was intact, The compradore had further admitted, witness continued, that fused the bank funds to advance loans to employees of the bank as well a3 those of other companies of the Raven group. The _compradore also admitted having used the bank's funds for a lock factory which was his own property.
Mr. Paul ¥, Ru, Assistant Muni-Jcipal Advocate, objected to Dr, Sellett" testimony, saying that investi gations were stil! being made about the compradore and that the testlmany was irelevant, Fischer then jumped to his feet and said that, if the police had Rot completed their investigations, he would ask for a suspension of the prosecution against his client, The hearing was further adjourned,
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.
