with Accordingly In the U. 8, Comm Mr. N. E. Lurton the usual number of delinquent ts on Saturday present to answer charges of violation of the Municipal traffic regulations, which were prosecuted by Chief Inspector Kinipple. It was an easy day, however, for the police, for it was not necessary in a single instance to call witnesses to prove the case defendants pleading guilty ready to accept the Court's decision if their explanation did not convince the Magistrate that extenuating circumstances existed, Mr. A. 1, Taylor, Shanghai baseball pitcher, had trouble with his lighting system two weeks ago and was fined G.$2, but the costs of the action were remitted. Mr.
E. Klein pleaded that his fan had be conte disconnected and short-circuited the lights without his knowledge—no penalty imposed, Dut defendant was warned. Br. C.
E. Cottrell was the third to be without the proper lighting to his motor-car—he found that a wire had broken and when his attention was called to it by an officer he proceeded to have it attended to at once, warned. Mr. G. M. Byers found guilty of obstructing traffic Nanknig Road—he had not parked his machine at a white Tine—was fined G.$2 and cautioned with reference toa repetition, A Bill for Smokes, With the conch traffic cases the act Vernandez v. James Crevlings came to the attention of the Commissioner. Plaintiff admitted judgment for chits for liquor, cigarettes and cigars amounting "to Mex, $133, bought during the past year. Mr. Y. Char' acted for complainant, while Mr. P. Faison appeared for defendant. Judgment was given for $108 and costs, after defence hud shown that certain payments had been made.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.