Dr. Richer further said that the The French physician demands that the whole recent procedure be annulled and that w "proper" election take place.
The defence averred that Dr. Richer wag not enlifed to bring sult because he had no "personal interest" in the snarier and was not entitled: to damages, even of merely $l. as he had not'suffered any Snancial loss, MIN. dAuxion de Rullé in reply, contended that Dr. Richer did have not even been published in connection with the office, and because as q ratepayer he was entitled to protection against any Irregularities in the Selection of Land Commissioners, Judgment was reserved,
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.