24, before his Honour Judge King, Saraj Din appeared on a judgment summons. The plaintiff in the ction was Abdullah Singh, a watehtan, who was was represented by Mr, A. M, Preston. It was shown that fadgment was given against the defendant some months ago in respect of waxes due to the plaintiff, and an order of $50 a month subsequently was made when the defendant failed to satisfy the Judgment and appeared in accord-nee with a judgment summons.
After evidence og to means and cross-examination by counsel for the plaintiff, his Lordship held that the previous order of the Court should stand. Tu the event of noncompliance with the order, the plaintis would have an opportunity to prove that the defendant was in a. Position to comply with the order of the Court,
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.