Secking legal' protection of the First Special District Court against decision of the City Government of Greater Shanghai, the mange tent of the Ching Wel Sik Way ing Ca, Pacting Road, through counsel, Atv, SoH, Mung, fled, ion before Judge Koo in the Special District Court for the wullifcation of the decision of the City Government's Labour Trouble Arbitration Commitzee order them to reinstate ten dismiss. fed workers who had been proven inefficient.
Mr, Hung toid the Court chat April 21, 1931, his clients dismissed few of their workmen for producing inferior products. As a protest, the other workmen went on "go-slow" strike and, as " result, more were dismissed, making th total ten." The dismissed workmen, nen appealed to the City -Government of Greater Shanghai which appointed its Lobo bit ration Committee the dispute. The committee decided ing Ca. had acted unreasonably and tha the dismissed workmen should be reinstated. He counsel told the Court, missed workmen had beet proved inefficient during the of their employment ard his were quite reasonable in dismissing In conclusion, counsel told the Court that he hed brought the action in the Court according to te araended Lavcur Law. Accord ing to the original text of Labour Law, counsel s.ated, cases in which] decisions had been given by the Arbitration Committee could not be heard by the Court. This provi sion had been modified according} to the amended Labour Lay, coun-
The Court adjourned the case sine die for the parties to arrange] 'a compromise: out of the Court.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.