To the Editor of the anti-Ciina Dai News."
Sim—I have often been tempted to ask what are the oft repeated rights which the Japanese have vociferously been claiming. They have been referred to by both Japanese civilians and ° politicians "special interests" and ights and privileges." 2 over 300. points. which China allegedly has not settled with Japan and this already formidable ist is now in th ess. of being augmented, according to. recent news, by a compilation now being' made by the military in Manchur China, refused to sigh the Versailles Peace Treaty because Japan declined to return Kiaochow to] China after she captured it from the Germans although China was one ofthe Allies and als, because the Conference then refus Siler the 2835, Peaty an? though President Wilson was. largely! instrumental in formulating the basis of peace, the Treaty was not Patifed: By America due partly to conditions in South China to be! generally bed, and, that bombo Hent ut apaacse Tikka Se htnen, "whee Sobanese rom the desteyee Tak have gained conta obviously, it is inconcel take the Iberty of
Baron. Abo. would make. such Statement, as oth of these Para raphe are quite incorrect. It wat Amoy instead of Macao, that two bombs were thrown at the Japanese Consulate." One' did not explode, Sut the other caused some damage to the roof. It is also true that Japanese marines were landed tore, lat they were soon withdrawn. am writing to my ome ofice order to have them call the attention of the "Advertiser" relative to this inaccurate news F. Murat.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.