The Archive · 1932

Hankow Incident a Reply to

To, the Eaitor of the "sNowrn-Cina' Dairy News." the proper technical reply to, Sim—Although you have given

In' your issue of to-day's date, should ike to append: my own remarks vas an "impartial foreign Jbserver ex the subject, through the courtesy of your columns.

Mr. U. K's invocation of the prob able result of a similar case. England, is an inconsistent, example, Jas woald remind him that punish: ment of offences all over the world fitter sesording. to. the laws and rules and the exigency of the extent of civilisation of the people. of the Which they are made jthe present ruler of Persia, a thief Jcould get his band cut off for the first offence, and now, Jcountries, are not convicted murder-Jers acquitted by the Jury whereas Jothers cannot escape the capital [punishment in several other places?

U.K. says that he is sceptical about the "attempt." If he is really 3 taking Pont civ Sect ait fa fine Ixenerally pay largely to the ricsha declare im i sao tty aloe ten ithe balance of coppers due. I admit aporias shorn, cla jrihacts seecterg, ent oe provoked ly assault foreigner bejeause he says it is actually never for 3° Mecca cee ESE il Stet fog a at ice Siti have been so stern with the ricsha Anyhow, I look uj the punishment meted out to riesha coolie jas having been too severe, but as rep in oe ats blet of Police and his superiors. I would, therefore, only that T feng te ath St Sere tte courtesy of the latter.

Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.

Your account