After argument by counsel for lover two hours, Judge A. G. Mossop jgcanted the Chartered Bank of Tidia, Australia, & China an injunction against. monies held by the Hongkong & Shanghai Banking. Corporation and. the National City Bank of New York, to the amount Jor $4,000, in the maine of A, Muck or Bush, Mack & Ca, ties bank, while Mr, "Br Hartopo Mir, A. B. Seddon appeared for
acted om' behalf of the. defendant, who war not present in court, The one originally came up for hearing Jon Monday, Feb. 19, the return day', but wax "adjourned to Feb. 31 Judge—Monsop far Mr. Haxtopp to ile a motion asking that Jan interlocutory Injunction, granted tothe plaintiff on February 1 by the acting Assistant Judge (Mr. 1H, Haines), be discharged.
His grounds for his application discharge, he said on Wednesday, were (a) that the plaintiff were not entitled to the injunction, us the de ined Mendant was being. exa the Forge chegs 0 the forged cheque 25, cashed on the ikon January 12, and purporting "to. be "drawn" by Bart, and (b) that in any event, the plaintiffs had not made out a ease For an tnjanction.
"They cannot get in injunction against a man, who is alleged to be debtor, from parting with his he stated. His learned property, end had now filed two afidavite the first of which stated that he had obtained his information from [Superintendent Robertson, who had Jobtained from defendant's office a paying-in book of the Hongkong Shanghai Bank and a deposit book of the National City Bank of New The other affidavit was by Sub-[Inspector Toon, who searched Jofices, and found the passbooks id which' showed that $2,000 was. deposited by defendant in the grat ink on January 16, and a further 'No save, trouble, a $2,000 in the National City Bank reply to cross-examination by day later. 'The entries just above Mr," Prlestwwood, ie said. he joined these two showed that the previous the' company al_ the age, of 64; he deposits had been paid in on Novem-was now 6). "Ho denied that the ber 14, 1993, and June 21, 1938, depreciation of some rubber shares: respectively, prevented him from retiring. The was nothing whatever to Ketter calling for is resignation show that these two deposits had came asa complete surprise. sini doced the case for the plainnything to do with the cheque merely an allegation," said After a shor! address by Me. ihis Lordship.
Prieatwood, Mr. N.E. Moller enter. ed the box. Captain' Anderson, he id, Wns ehigaged by his son whilst vas away, and he did not agree ete trea Mono, with Cap'ain' Anderson's account of the confirmation of his command. iis Laat heve Regarding the age-limit decision, he said that this was really an Mexcuse to let the old gentleman a gieg.tte a sep: down gently." He really wished to Sispense with-his services for other Feasons, which included his eyesight Would you say that the owner of and the navigation of a ship.
Dut forward the excuse about the Age-limit. because he did not wish show {or hurt the plainti's feelings.
'Regarding the incidents on Oct be yes,' replied Mr. Hartopp, "I "an that ease, the answer might ber ho said that when Captain Anderron came to see him about the. have not had time to conoider that Jetter calling for his. resignation on point. But I do that is) the arrival of hie ship in Shanghai, not the case here.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.