Terazzo work is easily compre hended, Mr. A. W. Raymond informed the U.S. Court for China Wednesday in the course of his test. many in connection with the claim of the" Shanghai. Marble Company ti. S. Bell, The case involving, technical' detail regarding its manufacture, "grading, and installation, was adjourned. by Judge Milton J. Helmick at noon, Continuing in the afternoon, 'Me. Cornell 8. Franklin, attorney for the plaintiff, rested his case after putting 4 witness in the box who maintained that terazzo installed by the Shang hai Marble Company in' the Belmont Apartments owned by Mr. Bell is substantially what" Mr." Raymond claimed it to be. 'The plainti, attempting to get a judgment for $2,816.19 for the terazzo in the apartment, contended that the work was delayed by the defendant, 'Mr. L. E. Lurton, counsel for the defendant, however," contended that the work' in question was inferior, and placed a witness in the box
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.