Continuing, Mr. McDonald avait with opposing counsel's second the ory, which he referred to as the "ultra-vires theory," and with Ils third theory, that of w fraud upon 4 third party. AMI the allegations the defence and the. counter-claim had been proved, and defendant was entitled to judgment on both.
Mr. Reeks referred to the fact that ridicule had ween poured upon him by counsel for the defence.
The, Judge—Ridicule s_sometimes poured on me, but I don't care.
Mr, Recks—But nol by members of this Bar.
Mr. Reeks referred to the evasion and "denials of the defendant as to the special account, and said that no letters had bee sent by him to the ntitf company asking for interest. He could only claim Interest in the sum of $4 on each bond as it was delivered. There was no question of set-off whatsoever. Defendant claimed that he took his whole share in the business by reason of his shares inthe company, but in his
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.