To the Eaitor of the "Nomu-Cura Dancy News"
'Sm—Because Mr. Kao Kwor, in his letter of July 31, published in your issue of August' 1, under the: tile of "Two Evils" still mentions my name, L hope you will allow me. to say a few words in reply to him. 1am gad obe ale 10 quote pars of your leading article of July 31, entitled, "Question of Method" In Tefutation of Mr. Kao Kwor's argument, in the expectation that Mr. Kao Kwok: may, in this way, be, more easily induced to pay attention to certain points, which he seems to have overlooked.
You write:
The Central Government is aware that in such matters pure logic unreliable guide. One of the most attractive, Yet often {tails of Chinese thought, fe te Bole the method of compromise. The defeated enemy is seldom pressed Towards the end of your leader, you say: the two generals could give definite assurances that their conduct It Kwangsi, as reports lead us to expect, declares independence on. August 5, the compromise ssu by you will be still more dificult to accomplish, But, at this time of crisis, only the most difficult undertakings are really worth attempting, Hit President Chiang would, even at this moment, still "preserve his Jequanimity, he would prove that he really imbued with new capacity of understanding the motives of other great men in China and of loving even those who, superficially considered, conduct themselves as his enemies. Such a victory over himself would give to President Chiang's position in China more real strength than a military victory over the Kwangsi armies. It is, perhaps, in President Chiang's own political his una case Of Hie. Whodos, hic Jeu Hart, Shanghai, Aug. 1,
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.