The Archive · 1936

Divorce Case

Jusye Milton J, Helntek A divorce action, Schneider versus Schneider, was heard inthe U.S, Court for China on Nov. 30 before Judge Milton J. Helmick: Sudgment was reserved, illic Cases afore swdge Bitton J. Hetmtel Six. (rafe offenders appeared before Judye Milion J, Melmick in the U.S. Court of China on Nov, 27 and all six cares disposed with the exception of one. The case against Me, Carl W. Shooss, who pleaded not guilty to two charges; the first for {ailing 10 obey promptly the signal of a police ofoer on duty. and the second for causing umneces-Sary obstruction, Judge Helmick Said that he had not time to hear the ease that morning and told the defendant he would be notified of the day it was set for hearing in due ithout branding you. malefactor, 1 will fine you $1 U. Judge Helmick told Mr. F. J. O'Hara. who was charged with "falling to keep in the line of (rafe and overs taking five or six cars. What amounted to, Judge Helmick said, was that the defendant was guilty. Passing vehicles on the wrong side.

'The case brought against Me. E, 3. Philips, a ranking. offender, was dismissed. "Mr. Norman H.. Gray, charged with' exceeding the time Hit in a waiting area by one hour and 45 minutes, was cautioned, Mr. Rdward John Bell and Mr. Alfred Lee, charged with similar offences und' exceeding the time Imit by. 30 utes and one hour and 35 minutes respectively, were also cautioned.

Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.

Your account