To the Editor of the ""Nonti-Cuina Dancy News"
Sin—Having stated that Mr, Haves was. incorrect in claiming record for Siboar and quoted the source of my proof, there's little" object In continuing, this discussion, Mr. Haves has written a further letter on the subject, which appeared in Your Sunday issue, here is my repl "Sie. "Haves says' "The statement contained in my advertisement. and {n my letter is based upon the printed 'Suthentie records appearing. In the fatest volume of Racing Record just Published and fo hand two days ace Well "two: days ago" appears rather peculiar as that would' be 'Thursday find Mr. Haves' advertisement must have been sent in on Tuesday. How= fever, Twill let that past, bul Mr, Hiaves goes on to suggest. that, should take up the question of the Fecords he refers to with the come petent authorities' Why. should 1? They have nothing 10 do with the fratier under discussion and a5 {0° 1 know are entirely "correct, Shots time was conaderably lower from the fact that he did! not carty an the Feeord time, 30, quite apart
Suielent weight. to quality for the card, he'has no" claim 1 ili ange If this does not satisfy Mr. Haves he has only to apply to any competent authority" himself, to earn that Sibear holds no record at all'on Shanghai, Feb, 13.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.