Claim $17.75, on a promissory note for work done, dated the 11th and payable on the 16th instant.
Defendant admitted the claim, subject to a deduction of $9 and some odd cents, on the ground that the charge for certain work (book-binding) was excessive, in com-ison with what other binders would have me the same work for, although this w. not known to the defendant when he gave the promissory note for the amount stated.
His Hoxour said he could not go behind the note under the circumstances Lrought before him, and gave judgment for the amount, payment to be made on Tuesday next.
Groroe Sunta & Ca, v, H.C. Caspr, Claim $24.73 for goods sold and delivered.
Defendant admitted the debt, but said arrangement was made between plaintiff and himself two or three months back, that he should pay $5 a month. He had paid this instalment once or twice, but this month he made it rather late, and on his gain, to plaintiff and offering him $10, the latter informed him he had already taken out a summons against hin.
Plaintiff said the arrangement was made, as far as he could tell, six months but the defendant had not kept it up, had therefore determined, as a last resource, to appeal to the Court, to fix the mode of ment.
defendant now offered $5 per month, which was accepted, and to pay costs,
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.