Dear Str,—I am in receipt of your letter of the 23rd inst. with reference to land required from B. C. Lots 1569, 1882, 2120 and 2205.
Tu reply, I beg to state the plan submitted by you now does not agree with the Road Extension Plan of 1894 inasmuch as the latter shows the road to cut off only the No: corner of Lot 2120 and a very small portion of Lot 1559, You will, I am sure, see that when I verbally agreed some time ago to surrender the land necessary for the road it was on the understanding that only the portion shown as required on the plan of 1893 was required from these two lots, and this would have left the remainder of the lots in one piece.
Tam now asked to agree to the lots being cut entirely in two, small trisogular plot with over 100 feet of valuable frontage being severed from the main portion.
Breach of Municipal Regulations...... 12: Grasity to Animals Embezzlement
Furious Riding and/or Driving Gamblin, Lil-treating Women and/or Childce Larceny from Persons mom orion mall
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.