Shanghai, 25th October.
Before J. C. E. Dovetas, Esq., Acting Assistant Judge.
Jartaa v. Panoomatt Bros.
Jaitha sued Pahoomall Bros. for Rs. 70, wage>, less Rs. 15 for clothes supplied.
The manager of the defendants sppeared and stated that he was not aware whether plaintiff was owed any money it would be necessary to refer to Hongkong to sce. Plaintiff had left this employ of his own accord.
Plaintiff said ho was a Hindu from Hyderabad. Ho entered the service of defendants in March, having been enaged at Hyderabad through his uncle.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.