Before Sir Havittanp ps Bavemanez, Judge, This was s claim for the sum of Tis, 9,500, damages for breach of contract made on September 3, 1914, for the sale and delivery by the defendants to the plaintiffs of 400 cases of window glass at Tls. 8 per case, to be delivered on No ember 28, 1914, which goods the fendants had refused to deliver The particulars of the damages wore:—Tls. 5 per case and Tls. 13 per case, the market price at the time of the breach of contract.
Mr, E. W. Godfrey appeared for the plain while Mr. H. P. Wilkinson defended.
Mr. Godfrey said he had spoken to his friend, and he had brought with him an affidavit which had been made by his cliente under Rule 101, and he thought it would be necessary to ask his Lordship to order pleading Mr. Wilkinson said that on the affidavit & very reasonable doubt could and had been raised, and his Lordship ordered pleadings Mo Lee-se v. P. G. Jonah.
The plaintiff's claim was for the return of o2rtain deeds, or their value, $3,000.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.