A dairyman waned Yah Kee, having a Road, was charged by sector of Markets, with adulterating milk.
Mr, Hugall said that two samples of milk had been taken from the defendant's a One was on the Bist August, and the man was then cautioned. The second sample was taken on the 5th instant and was analysed by Dr. Moore. The analysis was to the effect that the milk was of poor quality. As to cream, the sample curdled before it was separated. The taste was very poor. The bad swell, the rapid curdling, and a deposit of granite matter all pointed to dirty methods of Vottling. The milk was diluted with 35 per cent of added water. Similar bad results were shown on the analysis of the first sample of the same dairy's milk, on which occasion the prisoner was eaut'oned, The prisoner was previously connected with the Shanghai Dairy Company, before the premises were burnt down. Since he had had a dairy of his own in S Road. He had been four times previously convicted. He had been fined $50, $100, $150, and on the last occasion was sentenced to 200 blows on the hand and a fine of $100, There were 31 cows on the premises, but they were not all his property.
The prisoner was fined $200. and_his premises ordered to be closed up if he should be again convicted for adulteration. treating a mul van when suffering from harness sor the Bubbling Well Road on the 13th inst.
The defendant was fined $25 and ordered to pay for the keep of the mule till sound.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.