There ig a considerable amount fof evidence placed before me to show that his creditors had become an intolerable nuisance in the offices the newspaper, He further contracted debts with firms advertising in the "Mercury" which caused them to either delay or refuse to pay the newspaper until plaintiff Paid them, and on one occasion the plaintiff partially satisfied his own debt og the expense of the newspaper by giving the advertiser two receipts. for payment of advert ments in' the paper. He was engaged to employ his whole time on the newspaper and yet became connected with other publications, Jcontrary to the terms of the contract and the orders of his employers, He was cautioned about it and stated in writing that he had relinquished his connexion and yet continued, The plaintiff's own witness, Mr. she tates that Davey wanted to dismiss him once or twice, on account of his connexion with other papers.
I therefore find that 50 days' notice was " reasonable notice, that the defendants cause to dismiss the pi misconduct and give judgment for the defendants, with costs.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.