The Archive · 1926

Defendant's Retort

Was it not extraordinary that a client who was perfectly xatistied should get three more pairs of ylasscx maie?—Not more extract mary than that Mr, Chichyar tele phened from Mx. Meyer's shop for the preveription, that Mr, Me: tock him to Dr. Bell tha Mr. Meyer now is prompting meantime would cons: this 1 all part of an elaborate plot? Chicke told_us he was segest'g that, when unsatis telling an un-There 2 wr discussion on "cptometrs" and Mr. Newm: preaveed W D ing that the scien recognition in America, apprenti uncle, Mr. Mi, Rakueen caid that hi

and, jeweller in Leeds, fubsegaently and a year ago joined the O. I. C as scerctary and office manager to his cousin. On the occasion of plaintiffs first visit, witness drew! his attention to the firm's guarantee and exphited the details of it Witness corroborated the evidence given by defendant regarding the onlering and heceptance of the! lasses, Witness heard plaintiff? on ms_say that he satisfied with the glasses.

This concluded the ease for 2 defence.

In the course of the concluding: sikdress, Mr. Newman painted gsf that an' error of judgment di itself eovstitute negli to exercise a reasonable care and skill, The ease again was adjourned.

Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.

Your account