To this action " som of $45 war promissory note, -dubip intimated that he had Jence in thin case, which was to the effect that $45 bad bee received by the defendant from the tiff. Ao the other hand it was in evidence that the plaintiff bad From the defendant cer box, farvitare, ete.
Yesterday was Exchange, bat, time past, there was tle. A few stocks were quoted higher, including Langkats, which were done at Tle. 66.
The official basines on the Shanghai Stock Exchange yeatorday comprise Maatschappij, etc, in Langkat, Tle. 66 cash.
Kang Yik Cotton Ca, Ld. Tle. 11 had cow the award of the Gurdwara mich was enti ly in accordance with the impression that be bad rec ed. He had no doubt it was j ould be enforced by the Court.
Tt was to the effect that the plaintiff bad in his porression property to the value of $19.50 Agai this there wes this claim for $40 which they believed to be valid There remained, therefore, the sam of $25 50, and he woald giv for that amount io pi tif, with Court fees and interpre-Anglo-Java Estates, Ld. Tls. 6 cash, foe of $2.
Tebong Robber &. Tapioca Estate Ca. be defendant said that the G:
Tia. 11} cash. and the others had helped the plaintiff. Bata Annam (Johore) Rabber Estate, His Lordship remarked that he did Ld, Tls. 14 cash. not believe that to be trae.
Cheng Rubber Estates, Ld. Tle, 3.10 cash,
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.