Mr. Wright argued that the property in the drams bad passed to the com-parties which did not contain soy nas to the property not Mr. Oppe contended in support of the jadgement that the Court should ook at the whole of the correspondence and to the circumstances of the case, There was a term in the contract which showed that property in the drams should not pass until the goods had been folly paid for.
Their Lordships tod that jadgement would be given next day at leven o'clock.
The Court then rose.
Shanghsi Deo. 20.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.