Mr. Bryan was proceeding to sketch Garcia's career in China, when Dr. Fischer objected, sayinut that it was not based on evidence and that it was most unfair, The court already had refused to hear prio evidence, In was just slinging mud, The Judge said that the arguments of counsel were different from evidence. It was difficult to draw line of demarcation, but much time would be saved if there were not any objections, On the matter of citizenship, Me. Bryan said that the S.M.C. alwa} had taken the stand that they could not decide the question of that or any other court's jurisdiction, If Garcia did not actually own 151 Bubbling Well Road, at least seemed to be the person most interested in it, Counsel submitted, with regard to the lenses, that it was entirely a matter of establishing a scapegoat, first Alvarezin name and then Del Valle's. being used. It must be evident that gambling was going on during the time tthe lease was in Garcia's name, for the rental was Tls. 1,500 2 month and T cannot conceive any man in ing that just for a. to live and entertain Besides that, he had two telephones and his order book indicated supplies sufficient for a regiment of soldiers.
Concluding, Mr. Bryan My employers, the S.M.C., and mysel personally, contrary to whatever some people think, have no personal malice against these defendants.
Alli we want is a conviction and a finding of guilty. Whether you sentence them for a long or a short term is entirely for you to decide and we have nothing to say. We think the cause we represent is righteous and we have finished our work."
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.