In U.S. Court for China on Thurs dey, before His Honour Judge. Purdy, the ease of Zung Yer-ling, doing business under the name of Vu Yutshing Incandescent Lamp Ca, y. Lam, Glines & Ca., came up for hearing. Tt involved the sum of Tis, 14,226.66 alleged to have been the loss on the part of the plaintiff? frm because certain deliveries of a kerosene lamp, known "Existo" had not been made according to the terms of a contract which plaintiff hold existent, Defendant denied the existence pf this contract ina generat denial saying that although defendant had signed the contract and sent two copies to plaintiff, one for plaintit's files and one for his signature for return to defendant, neither of these had ever been returned. Appearing for the plaintiffs was Dr. H.C. Mei, and on behalf of the defendants was Mr, H, D. Rodzer.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.