'To the Editor of the "Nonti-Ciano Dany News'
Sit is not surprising that Mr. Suaw has failed to, receive any Feasonable answer {0 his question "What the next war is to bring in vain to the victor" because, Shaw will forgive my saying 50, his not a reasonable question.
The last war was not waged for money, territory or trade, neither will the next be, nor the one after that.
for one, do not know what the last war was fought for, but it is at least lear that the real motives, whatever they may have been,, were certainly not the avowed motives.
We shall, I think, be a step towards the abolition of war when we can understand what it is that makes the 'Your own answer to my question is really' contained in the following words: "*It is safe' to argue from Tecent precedent that neither victor hor vanquished would. profit. Mr. Shaw "cannot. be' answered" with greater directness except by "the Startian novelist"
You remark aiso:—the resultant confagration.became world-wide present landmarks night lsappear, civilization totter, find Uunpavalised sorrow and sulfer= tug ensues"
'A Similar prediction has recently been pronounced by" INF. "Stanley Baldwin, There are two points to observe in comparing the war of 1914 with the next Mass-Massacre. For the former nation was prepared. y all are warned, and
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.