London, Mar. 10.
Mr. Neville Chamberlain, Chaneller of the Exchequer, has'not yet {decided how to dispose of the expect. fed Budget surplus, Binmingian today. in which warned of the unwisdom of coming birmingham to-day, in whic
a final conclusion until it was certain that a surplus existed, and, if's0, what its size was, 'The Chancellor said that the distribution, of "some part of such hypothetical surplus'? was a weighty question, into which many considera. tons entered, and he had at present not come to any conclusions.
Referring to the movement headed by the Archbishop of York for en-wring that the question of restoring the cuts made in unemployment relief should be given first consi Geration, Xr. Chamberlain - said there was nobody who did not share on' the Archbishop's sympathy with the He udded, however, that, when he read a letter which the Archbishop wrote to the press, "urging those Who agreed with him to write to their members in Parliament," he thought it a pity that the Archbishop should seem to imply. that members required to be reminded of their humanitarian feelings, e'vopredied "ato" hat the Acie bishop should have suggested that al the Arehmembers of Parliament were Iarge-Ty to be guided by the number of letters they received rather than by) their own Judgment, a ence 5 March is the general belief in Britain, Well-informed people are already asserting that the majority of members of the Cabinet are in favour of disposing some of the expected surplus by cutting three-cuts made in the wages and salaries of all government employees and the defence services as an economy cian Geena Att coe tion would cost £30,000,000 in a full year—Reuter.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.