London, Jan. 4.
"The very firm American note on New Year's eve is considered to be 2 final rejection of the Japanese thesis that a new order established by JJapanese military action in the Far East justifies an unilateral revision of treaties and other conditions." the "Yorkshire Post™ stated this morning, commenting on the recent American note to Japan regarding diserimination against foreign trade interests in China.
"The note has been looked upon in other capitals as an invitation to the British Government to follow suit in requiring Japan to present any proposals she wishes to put forward at Such a conference as the United States has in mind." the paper added. "There seems to be no reason why the British Government should not publicly affirm their alignment with, the attitude of the United States especially in view of the repeated charges which have been made in this country and others that Great Britain failed in January, 1992 to take the opportunity for a closely-coordin~ ated policy in the Far East. offered by the note sent by Mr. Henry: L, Stimson, then American Secretary} of State, regarding Japan's policy in
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.